DSpace Repository

PLAYERS OF MALE TEAMS’ RESILIENCE: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONTENT PARAMETERS

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Popovych, I. S.
dc.contributor.author Prytuliak, O.
dc.contributor.author Dushka, A.
dc.contributor.author Beregova, N.
dc.contributor.author Ihumnova, O.
dc.contributor.author Dzhyhun, L.
dc.contributor.author Попович, І. С.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-16T08:35:23Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-16T08:35:23Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.uri http://ekhsuir.kspu.edu/123456789/16575
dc.description Popovych, I., Prytuliak, O., Dushka, A., Beregova, N., Ihumnova, O., & Dzhyhun, L. (2022). Players of male teams’ resilience: comparative analysis of content parameters. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 22(7), 1581-1589. DOI: 10.7752/jpes.2022.07199. uk_UA
dc.description.abstract The purpose of the article is an empirical study and comparison of the content parameters of the resilience of male football teams that won (Group 1; n=66), lost Group 2; n=66), and drew (Group 3; n=44). Research methods: valid psychodiagnostic methods using standard survey forms were used in the study, as well as Spearman correlation analysis (rs) and the Student’s t-test. Results. It has been substantiated that the resilience of male football players is an integrated set of qualities, protective mechanisms, psychophysiological processes, and psycho-emotional states targeted at dealing with adversity, struggling, and overcoming/ not overcoming stress with a new level of functioning. It was found that the Resilience parameters of players who drew (Group 3) and players who won (Group 1) varied significantly RS (t=2.3; р<.05). It is explained that a team that receives a draw from the pre-game setup might develop such an expected model of events, which is followed by the mobilization of internal psycho-emotional efforts to the highest potential degree of player resilience. The resilience factors of Group 1 over Group 2 were revealed to be Cheerfulness (t=2.1; р<.05) and Motivation to Succeed (t=3.2; р<.01). It is established (р<.01; р<.05) and proven that an active life position, optimism, love for life, and emotional stability are powerful motivators for winning football players. Conclusions. The first hypothesis was rejected since the significant differences in resilience between Group 3 and Group 1 were t=2.3; р<.05, indicating that the players who played a draw outweighed the winners in terms of Resilience. The second hypothesis was confirmed since Group 3 respondents consistently outweighed Group 2 respondents in Resilience and Motivation to Succeed (р<.05). It is recommended to include the acquired results into the coaching staff’s work on football players’ tactical and psychological preparation for the game. uk_UA
dc.subject resilience uk_UA
dc.subject protective mechanisms uk_UA
dc.subject foreplay uk_UA
dc.subject mental state uk_UA
dc.subject mental health uk_UA
dc.title PLAYERS OF MALE TEAMS’ RESILIENCE: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONTENT PARAMETERS uk_UA
dc.type Article uk_UA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Факультет психології, історії та соціології
    Кафедра соціальної роботи, соціальної педагогіки та соціології. Кафедра психології. Кафедра історії, археології та методики викладання. Кафедра філософії та соціально-гуманітарних наук

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account